COMPLIMENTARY SHIPPING OVER $75 — AUSTRALIA-WIDESHOP NOW, PAY LATER WITH AFTERPAYCOMPLIMENTARY SHIPPING OVER $75 — AUSTRALIA-WIDESHOP NOW, PAY LATER WITH AFTERPAYCOMPLIMENTARY SHIPPING OVER $75 — AUSTRALIA-WIDESHOP NOW, PAY LATER WITH AFTERPAYCOMPLIMENTARY SHIPPING OVER $75 — AUSTRALIA-WIDESHOP NOW, PAY LATER WITH AFTERPAY
All Journal Articles

Founder notes

Formulated to work, not to sell

Two cosmetic chemists on why every percentage in our skincare is chosen for efficacy — never for marketing.

Dani & Pam — Founders & Cosmetic Chemists6 min read

We are cosmetic chemists first and founders second. Before Trademark, we formulated for other brands — and what we saw behind the curtain is the reason this company exists. Time and again, a hero active was added to a formula at a fraction of the concentration the research used, purely so the word could sit on the front of the label. The marketing wrote the formula, not the other way around.

For Dani, this was never an abstract issue. As a teenager she had extremely bad acne — the kind she was bullied for at school, the kind that makes you plan your day around hiding your skin. She didn't need a pretty promise on a jar. She needed a formula that actually worked. Trademark exists because she couldn't find one, and because she has the chemistry to build it.

The marketing wrote the formula, not the other way around.

Percentages are the point

Published clinical research is specific about concentration for a reason. When a study shows an active reduces blemishes, supports barrier recovery or improves firmness at 3%, that result belongs to 3% — not to 0.03% tucked into the end of an ingredient list. We formulate every active in our skincare at the percentage the evidence supports, and we build the rest of the formula around it.

This is the most expensive decision in skincare. A fully loaded active system costs many times more than a base of fillers topped with a dash of the hero ingredient. We accept that cost, because a formula that reads beautifully but performs marginally is, in our view, dishonest — the bottle charges you for a promise the percentages can't keep.

No filler. No fairy-dusting.

It also means saying no. If an active can't be included at its studied concentration — because of stability, pH conflict or cost — we don't include it at all. There is no token ingredient in our formulas doing marketing work instead of skin work. What is on the label is in the bottle, at a dose that can actually do something.

That standard comes straight from Dani's bathroom shelf twenty years ago. Every product in the HER and HIM systems is the formula she needed then: actives at the correct percentages, nothing for show, and results you can measure — because skincare should work for the person using it, not just for the profit margin.

What is on the label is in the bottle, at a dose that can actually do something.

Keep reading